Triple
T20395704
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Clementia of Zähringen |
E500196
|
entity |
| Predicate | placeOfBirth |
P1
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Zähringen territories in the Holy Roman Empire |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (3 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Zähringen territories in the Holy Roman Empire | Statement: [Clementia of Zähringen, placeOfBirth, Zähringen territories in the Holy Roman Empire]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Zähringen territories in the Holy Roman Empire Context triple: [Clementia of Zähringen, placeOfBirth, Zähringen territories in the Holy Roman Empire]
-
A.
Bavarian territories
The Bavarian territories were the historical lands in southern Germany ruled by the Wittelsbach dynasty, forming the core of what became the modern state of Bavaria.
-
B.
Holy Roman Empire border territories
The Holy Roman Empire border territories were frontier regions along the empire’s western edge that became focal points of French expansion and legalistic annexation under Louis XIV’s reunions policy.
-
C.
Welf territories
Welf territories were the various lands and principalities in the Holy Roman Empire ruled by the influential Welf (Guelph) dynasty, including regions such as Brunswick and Hanover.
-
D.
Wittelsbacher Land
Wittelsbacher Land is a historical region in Bavaria, Germany, known as the ancestral homeland of the Wittelsbach dynasty and characterized by its castles, rural landscapes, and cultural heritage.
-
E.
Offices of the Holy Roman Empire
The Offices of the Holy Roman Empire were the principal high-ranking secular and ecclesiastical positions that structured and administered the complex political hierarchy of the Holy Roman Empire.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Zähringen territories in the Holy Roman Empire Target entity description: The Zähringen territories in the Holy Roman Empire were a collection of medieval lordships and duchies in southwestern Germany and parts of present-day Switzerland ruled by the noble House of Zähringen.
-
A.
Bavarian territories
The Bavarian territories were the historical lands in southern Germany ruled by the Wittelsbach dynasty, forming the core of what became the modern state of Bavaria.
-
B.
Holy Roman Empire border territories
The Holy Roman Empire border territories were frontier regions along the empire’s western edge that became focal points of French expansion and legalistic annexation under Louis XIV’s reunions policy.
-
C.
Welf territories
Welf territories were the various lands and principalities in the Holy Roman Empire ruled by the influential Welf (Guelph) dynasty, including regions such as Brunswick and Hanover.
-
D.
Wittelsbacher Land
Wittelsbacher Land is a historical region in Bavaria, Germany, known as the ancestral homeland of the Wittelsbach dynasty and characterized by its castles, rural landscapes, and cultural heritage.
-
E.
Offices of the Holy Roman Empire
The Offices of the Holy Roman Empire were the principal high-ranking secular and ecclesiastical positions that structured and administered the complex political hierarchy of the Holy Roman Empire.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0b4a71ebc8190b153a36c738730f4 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 10:06 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e67912d7948190ac2fda8ce95e5c70 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 7:05 p.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 11:28 a.m.