Triple

T20358671
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Verizon Maryland Inc. v. Public Service Commission of Maryland E496717 entity
Predicate fullName P16 FINISHED
Object Verizon Maryland Inc. v. Public Service Commission of Maryland — NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Verizon Maryland Inc. v. Public Service Commission of Maryland | Statement: [Verizon Maryland Inc. v. Public Service Commission of Maryland, fullName, Verizon Maryland Inc. v. Public Service Commission of Maryland]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Verizon Maryland Inc. v. Public Service Commission of Maryland
Context triple: [Verizon Maryland Inc. v. Public Service Commission of Maryland, fullName, Verizon Maryland Inc. v. Public Service Commission of Maryland]
  • A. Verizon Maryland Inc. v. Public Service Commission of Maryland chosen
    Verizon Maryland Inc. v. Public Service Commission of Maryland is a 2002 U.S. Supreme Court case that addressed federal court jurisdiction and state sovereign immunity in disputes over telecommunications regulation under the Telecommunications Act of 1996.
  • B. MCI v. AT&T
    MCI v. AT&T was a landmark U.S. antitrust lawsuit in the telecommunications industry that challenged AT&T’s monopoly and helped open the long-distance market to competition.
  • C. United States v. AT&T
    United States v. AT&T was a landmark antitrust lawsuit in which the U.S. government forced the breakup of the Bell System telecommunications monopoly in the early 1980s.
  • D. H.J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.
    H.J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co. is a 1989 U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified the "pattern of racketeering activity" requirement under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO).
  • E. Maryland v. Wirtz
    Maryland v. Wirtz was a 1968 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the extension of federal minimum wage and overtime provisions to employees of state-operated schools and hospitals under the Fair Labor Standards Act.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e0b4a3f7f48190b37f354574028ca6 completed April 16, 2026, 10:06 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e678573fc481908bf257e6ed41d750 completed April 20, 2026, 7:02 p.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 11:25 a.m.