Triple
T20358664
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Pennhurst State School & Hospital v. Halderman |
E496716
|
entity |
| Predicate | citationStyle |
P4468
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Pennhurst State School & Hospital v. Halderman, 465 U.S. 89 (1984) |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Pennhurst State School & Hospital v. Halderman, 465 U.S. 89 (1984) | Statement: [Pennhurst State School & Hospital v. Halderman, citationStyle, Pennhurst State School & Hospital v. Halderman, 465 U.S. 89 (1984)]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Pennhurst State School & Hospital v. Halderman, 465 U.S. 89 (1984) Context triple: [Pennhurst State School & Hospital v. Halderman, citationStyle, Pennhurst State School & Hospital v. Halderman, 465 U.S. 89 (1984)]
-
A.
Pennhurst State School & Hospital v. Halderman
chosen
Pennhurst State School & Hospital v. Halderman is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case that limited federal court authority over state institutions by holding that the Eleventh Amendment bars federal courts from ordering state officials to comply with state law.
-
B.
Frontiero v. Richardson
Frontiero v. Richardson is a landmark 1973 U.S. Supreme Court case that advanced gender equality by striking down federal benefit rules that discriminated against female military service members.
-
C.
Regan v. Wald
Regan v. Wald is a 1984 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld federal restrictions on travel to Cuba, affirming broad executive authority over foreign affairs and economic sanctions.
-
D.
Murdock v. Pennsylvania
Murdock v. Pennsylvania is a 1943 U.S. Supreme Court case that held it unconstitutional to impose a license tax on the distribution of religious literature, reinforcing First Amendment protections for religious proselytizing.
-
E.
Parker v. Davis
Parker v. Davis was a post–Civil War U.S. Supreme Court case that addressed the constitutionality of making paper money legal tender for preexisting debts under the Legal Tender Acts.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0b4a3f7f48190b37f354574028ca6 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 10:06 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e678573fc481908bf257e6ed41d750 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 7:02 p.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 11:25 a.m.