Triple

T20358624
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Pennhurst State School & Hospital v. Halderman E496716 entity
Predicate fullName P16 FINISHED
Object Pennhurst State School & Hospital v. Halderman — NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Pennhurst State School & Hospital v. Halderman | Statement: [Pennhurst State School & Hospital v. Halderman, fullName, Pennhurst State School & Hospital v. Halderman]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Pennhurst State School & Hospital v. Halderman
Context triple: [Pennhurst State School & Hospital v. Halderman, fullName, Pennhurst State School & Hospital v. Halderman]
  • A. Pennhurst State School & Hospital v. Halderman chosen
    Pennhurst State School & Hospital v. Halderman is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case that limited federal court authority over state institutions by holding that the Eleventh Amendment bars federal courts from ordering state officials to comply with state law.
  • B. Regan v. Wald
    Regan v. Wald is a 1984 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld federal restrictions on travel to Cuba, affirming broad executive authority over foreign affairs and economic sanctions.
  • C. County of Allegheny v. ACLU
    County of Allegheny v. ACLU is a 1989 U.S. Supreme Court case that refined the interpretation of the Establishment Clause by addressing the constitutionality of religious holiday displays on government property.
  • D. Martin v. City of Struthers
    Martin v. City of Struthers is a 1943 U.S. Supreme Court decision that struck down a city ordinance banning door-to-door leaflet distribution, reinforcing First Amendment protections for free speech and religious proselytizing.
  • E. Cooley v. Board of Wardens
    Cooley v. Board of Wardens is an 1852 U.S. Supreme Court decision that helped define the scope of the Commerce Clause by allowing states to regulate certain local aspects of commerce, such as port pilotage, without violating federal authority.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e0b4a3f7f48190b37f354574028ca6 completed April 16, 2026, 10:06 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e67855c3a88190b88839a47d01184d completed April 20, 2026, 7:02 p.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 11:25 a.m.