Triple

T20358596
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Edelman v. Jordan E496715 entity
Predicate holding P2237 FINISHED
Object Federal courts may grant prospective injunctive relief against state officials under Ex parte Young but may not award retroactive monetary awards payable from state funds. NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Federal courts may grant prospective injunctive relief against state officials under Ex parte Young but may not award retroactive monetary awards payable from state funds. | Statement: [Edelman v. Jordan, holding, Federal courts may grant prospective injunctive relief against state officials under Ex parte Young but may not award retroactive monetary awards payable from state funds.]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Federal courts may grant prospective injunctive relief against state officials under Ex parte Young but may not award retroactive monetary awards payable from state funds.
Context triple: [Edelman v. Jordan, holding, Federal courts may grant prospective injunctive relief against state officials under Ex parte Young but may not award retroactive monetary awards payable from state funds.]
  • A. Ex parte Young chosen
    Ex parte Young is a landmark 1908 U.S. Supreme Court decision that created a legal fiction allowing suits in federal court against state officials to stop ongoing violations of federal law, despite state sovereign immunity under the Eleventh Amendment.
  • B. Anti-Injunction Act
    The Anti-Injunction Act is a U.S. federal statute that generally prohibits federal courts from issuing injunctions to stay proceedings in state courts, subject to a few narrowly defined exceptions.
  • C. Bivens doctrine
    The Bivens doctrine is a judicially created legal principle that allows individuals to seek damages in federal court against U.S. federal officials for certain constitutional rights violations, despite the general barrier of sovereign immunity.
  • D. Federal Courts Act
    The Federal Courts Act is a Canadian statute that establishes and defines the jurisdiction, powers, and procedures of the Federal Court and Federal Court of Appeal.
  • E. New York State in federal courts
    New York State in federal courts refers to the state government of New York when it is a party to litigation or legal proceedings within the U.S. federal judicial system.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e0b4a3f7f48190b37f354574028ca6 completed April 16, 2026, 10:06 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e67855c3a88190b88839a47d01184d completed April 20, 2026, 7:02 p.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 11:25 a.m.