Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: Ex parte Young doctrine | Statement: [Edelman v. Jordan, legalDoctrine, Ex parte Young doctrine]

Target entity: Ex parte Young doctrine
Context triple: [Edelman v. Jordan, legalDoctrine, Ex parte Young doctrine]

• A. Ex parte Young chosen
  Ex parte Young is a landmark 1908 U.S. Supreme Court decision that created a legal fiction allowing suits in federal court against state officials to stop ongoing violations of federal law, despite state sovereign immunity under the Eleventh Amendment.
• B. Bivens doctrine
  The Bivens doctrine is a judicially created legal principle that allows individuals to seek damages in federal court against U.S. federal officials for certain constitutional rights violations, despite the general barrier of sovereign immunity.
• C. Noerr-Pennington doctrine
  The Noerr-Pennington doctrine is a U.S. legal principle that shields individuals and entities from antitrust liability when they petition the government, even if their efforts have anticompetitive effects.
• D. Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer
  Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer is a landmark 1952 U.S. Supreme Court case that limited presidential power by ruling that President Truman lacked authority to seize steel mills during the Korean War without congressional approval.
• E. Alden v. Maine
  Alden v. Maine is a 1999 U.S. Supreme Court decision that expanded state sovereign immunity by holding that states are generally immune from private suits for damages in their own courts under federal law.
• F. None of above.
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.