Triple

T20343513
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Fort Canby E495803 entity
Predicate partOf P40 FINISHED
Object Harbor Defenses of the Columbia NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (3 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Harbor Defenses of the Columbia | Statement: [Fort Canby, partOf, Harbor Defenses of the Columbia]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Harbor Defenses of the Columbia
Context triple: [Fort Canby, partOf, Harbor Defenses of the Columbia]
  • A. Harbor Defenses of Puget Sound
    Harbor Defenses of Puget Sound were a network of U.S. coastal fortifications and military installations designed to protect the Puget Sound region and its naval facilities from seaborne attack, particularly during the late 19th and early 20th centuries.
  • B. Harbor Defenses of San Francisco
    Harbor Defenses of San Francisco were a network of coastal fortifications and artillery installations designed to protect the San Francisco Bay and its vital military and commercial assets from naval attack.
  • C. Fort Steilacoom
    Fort Steilacoom was a 19th-century U.S. Army post in what is now Lakewood, Washington, that played a key role in the early military and settlement history of the Pacific Northwest.
  • D. Savannah harbor defenses
    Savannah harbor defenses were a network of Confederate fortifications and artillery positions protecting the strategic port of Savannah, Georgia, during the American Civil War.
  • E. Harbor Defenses of Portsmouth
    Harbor Defenses of Portsmouth were a network of coastal fortifications and military installations that protected the strategic harbor area around Portsmouth, New Hampshire, particularly during the 19th and 20th centuries.
  • F. None of above. chosen
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Harbor Defenses of the Columbia
Target entity description: Harbor Defenses of the Columbia was a U.S. Army coastal defense command responsible for protecting the mouth of the Columbia River and nearby coastal areas through a network of forts and artillery installations.
  • A. Harbor Defenses of Puget Sound
    Harbor Defenses of Puget Sound were a network of U.S. coastal fortifications and military installations designed to protect the Puget Sound region and its naval facilities from seaborne attack, particularly during the late 19th and early 20th centuries.
  • B. Harbor Defenses of San Francisco
    Harbor Defenses of San Francisco were a network of coastal fortifications and artillery installations designed to protect the San Francisco Bay and its vital military and commercial assets from naval attack.
  • C. Fort Steilacoom
    Fort Steilacoom was a 19th-century U.S. Army post in what is now Lakewood, Washington, that played a key role in the early military and settlement history of the Pacific Northwest.
  • D. Savannah harbor defenses
    Savannah harbor defenses were a network of Confederate fortifications and artillery positions protecting the strategic port of Savannah, Georgia, during the American Civil War.
  • E. Harbor Defenses of Portsmouth
    Harbor Defenses of Portsmouth were a network of coastal fortifications and military installations that protected the strategic harbor area around Portsmouth, New Hampshire, particularly during the 19th and 20th centuries.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e0b4a3320881909495ae8bc30bc2dc completed April 16, 2026, 10:06 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e67837bef8819091e552d1c8a1665c completed April 20, 2026, 7:02 p.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 11:24 a.m.