Triple

T2033923
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Montgomery Ward E44578 entity
Predicate brandRevivedAs P7738 FINISHED
Object online retailer LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: online retailer | Statement: [Montgomery Ward, brandRevivedAs, online retailer]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: brandRevivedAs
Context triple: [Montgomery Ward, brandRevivedAs, online retailer]
  • A. formerBrand
    Indicates that an entity was previously used or recognized as a brand for another entity but is no longer its current brand.
  • B. brand
    Indicates that one entity is the commercial brand or label under which another entity (such as a product, service, or organization) is marketed or identified.
  • C. revivedBy chosen
    Indicates that an entity has been brought back to life, consciousness, or active state through the action or intervention of another entity.
  • D. successorBranding
    Indicates that one brand has replaced or continued another brand as its subsequent or updated identity.
  • E. brandingStatus
    Indicates the current state or condition of an entity’s branding, such as whether its brand identity has been defined, applied, updated, or is pending.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a889144f2481909932f0746a93023d completed March 4, 2026, 7:33 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69abb93387488190ac9d8d2746451f2e completed March 7, 2026, 5:35 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69abb7a8125881909c0cb58b777c1faa completed March 7, 2026, 5:29 a.m.
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:39 p.m.