Triple
T20325333
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | State Budget of Portugal |
E492317
|
entity |
| Predicate | canBeRevisedBy |
P12017
|
FINISHED |
| Object | amending budget laws |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: amending budget laws | Statement: [State Budget of Portugal, canBeRevisedBy, amending budget laws]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: canBeRevisedBy Context triple: [State Budget of Portugal, canBeRevisedBy, amending budget laws]
-
A.
canBeCorrectedBy
Indicates that something has the potential to be made accurate, fixed, or improved through the intervention or action of a specified agent or method.
-
B.
mayBeModifiedBy
chosen
Indicates that an entity has the potential to be altered, changed, or updated by another entity or process.
-
C.
amendedBy
Indicates that one entity has been modified, revised, or updated as a result of changes made by another entity.
-
D.
revisionOf
Indicates that one entity is a modified or updated version of another earlier entity.
-
E.
canReview
Indicates that one entity has the permission or ability to evaluate, assess, or provide feedback on another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0b4a0134081909113563e1c3ba68a |
completed | April 16, 2026, 10:06 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e6778f20288190b1862d6be61bfb67 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 6:59 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e5762655ac8190a8cc48a29fa2c0c4 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 12:41 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 11:21 a.m.