Triple
T2029925
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Commentary on the Epistles of Paul |
E44492
|
entity |
| Predicate | reflectsDebates |
P8604
|
FINISHED |
| Object | original sin |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: original sin | Statement: [Commentary on the Epistles of Paul, reflectsDebates, original sin]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: reflectsDebates Context triple: [Commentary on the Epistles of Paul, reflectsDebates, original sin]
-
A.
hasLongTermDebateOn
Indicates that there is an ongoing, extended period of discussion, disagreement, or argument concerning a particular topic or issue.
-
B.
hasDebate
chosen
Indicates that there is a formal discussion or argument between entities, typically presenting opposing viewpoints on a topic.
-
C.
hasDebatedStatus
Indicates that an entity has participated in or been assigned a particular status related to a debate or debating activity.
-
D.
enteredPoliticalDebateIn
Indicates that an entity took part in a political debate that occurred in a specified place or context.
-
E.
canSpeakInDebates
Indicates that an entity has the ability or permission to speak during formal debates.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a889144f2481909932f0746a93023d |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:33 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abb914a40081909a937689bea3dc85 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 5:35 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69abb7a656248190ac2ced196b35bc6b |
completed | March 7, 2026, 5:29 a.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:38 p.m.