Triple
T2028005
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Operation Promote Liberty |
E44451
|
entity |
| Predicate | followsConflictPhase |
P34709
|
FINISHED |
| Object | combat phase of the 1989 invasion of Panama |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: combat phase of the 1989 invasion of Panama | Statement: [Operation Promote Liberty, followsConflictPhase, combat phase of the 1989 invasion of Panama]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: followsConflictPhase Context triple: [Operation Promote Liberty, followsConflictPhase, combat phase of the 1989 invasion of Panama]
-
A.
subsequentConflict
Indicates that one conflict occurs after and is temporally subsequent to another conflict.
-
B.
hasOngoingConflict
Indicates that there is a current, unresolved state of opposition, dispute, or hostilities between the related entities.
-
C.
previousConflict
Indicates that a conflict or dispute occurred between the entities at some earlier time prior to the current context.
-
D.
appliesToConflictWith
Indicates that one element’s scope, rules, or effects are relevant to a conflict involving another element, defining how that element is implicated in or governed by the conflict.
-
E.
endedConflict
Indicates that a previously ongoing conflict between entities has been brought to an end.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a889144f2481909932f0746a93023d |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:33 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abb911e5dc819097e40af0da4d01e7 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 5:35 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69abb7a656248190ac2ced196b35bc6b |
completed | March 7, 2026, 5:29 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69abb85fe7a08190b991b1f23bc34f93 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 5:32 a.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:38 p.m.