Triple
T20268102
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Cheating on You |
E499019
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasNotableLyric |
P18290
|
FINISHED |
| Object | “I promise that the ending always stays the same / So there’s no good reason to make believe that we could ever exist again” |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: “I promise that the ending always stays the same / So there’s no good reason to make believe that we could ever exist again” | Statement: [Cheating on You, hasNotableLyric, “I promise that the ending always stays the same / So there’s no good reason to make believe that we could ever exist again”]
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69da6275fa6c8190952924930adee150 |
completed | April 11, 2026, 3:02 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e675dbb7ac8190a40c527f2c02ca50 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 6:52 p.m. |
Created at: April 11, 2026, 11:42 p.m.