Triple
T20265883
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Atascosa County |
E498965
|
entity |
| Predicate | borderedBy |
P224
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Wilson County |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Wilson County | Statement: [Atascosa County, borderedBy, Wilson County]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Wilson County Context triple: [Atascosa County, borderedBy, Wilson County]
-
A.
Wilson County
Wilson County is a county in eastern North Carolina known for its seat, the city of Wilson, and its role in the region’s agricultural and manufacturing economy.
-
B.
Wilson County
Wilson County is a county in central Tennessee known for its seat in Lebanon and its location just east of the Nashville metropolitan area.
-
C.
Wilson County
chosen
Wilson County is a rural county in Texas known for its agricultural heritage, small towns, and location within the San Antonio metropolitan area.
-
D.
Mitchell County
Mitchell County is a cadastral division in New South Wales, Australia, used for land administration and property title purposes.
-
E.
Mitchell County
Mitchell County is a rural mountain county in western North Carolina known for its scenic Appalachian landscapes, outdoor recreation, and small-town communities.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69da6275fa6c8190952924930adee150 |
completed | April 11, 2026, 3:02 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e674cf3d648190a0b0a7795045228a |
completed | April 20, 2026, 6:47 p.m. |
Created at: April 11, 2026, 11:42 p.m.