Triple
T20240761
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Louisiana Separate Car Act |
E498280
|
entity |
| Predicate | legalPrincipleAffirmedByCourt |
P4756
|
FINISHED |
| Object | separate but equal |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: separate but equal | Statement: [Louisiana Separate Car Act, legalPrincipleAffirmedByCourt, separate but equal]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: legalPrincipleAffirmedByCourt Context triple: [Louisiana Separate Car Act, legalPrincipleAffirmedByCourt, separate but equal]
-
A.
legalPrecedentFrom
Indicates that a legal decision, ruling, or principle is derived from, based on, or justified by an earlier legal case or authority.
-
B.
legalDoctrine
chosen
Indicates that one legal principle, rule, or theory is being applied, referenced, or relied upon as an authoritative basis for interpreting or deciding a legal issue.
-
C.
legalPrecedentInvolved
Indicates that a particular legal precedent (prior court decision or ruling) is relevant to, cited in, or forms the basis for the current legal matter or action.
-
D.
legalCodeFocus
Indicates that something is specifically concerned with, centered on, or primarily addressing a particular legal code or body of law.
-
E.
legalRulingNature
Indicates the type or character of a legal ruling, such as its form, basis, or procedural nature.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69da6274c58c81909c646eabed6f4f30 |
completed | April 11, 2026, 3:02 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e6716eabf48190ae4e760f472114bd |
completed | April 20, 2026, 6:33 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e55b1b23f88190bdcbe2f81dd226dd |
completed | April 19, 2026, 10:45 p.m. |
Created at: April 11, 2026, 11:40 p.m.