Triple
T202247
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Menorah |
E4529
|
entity |
| Predicate | ritualStatus |
P6169
|
FINISHED |
| Object | sacred object |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: sacred object | Statement: [Menorah, ritualStatus, sacred object]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: ritualStatus Context triple: [Menorah, ritualStatus, sacred object]
-
A.
hasRitual
Indicates that an entity performs, observes, or is associated with a specific ritual or ceremonial practice.
-
B.
hasLifecycleRitual
Indicates that an entity is associated with a ritual or ceremonial practice marking a significant stage or transition in its lifecycle.
-
C.
hasRitualObject
Indicates that an entity possesses, uses, or is associated with an object specifically employed in a ritual or ceremonial context.
-
D.
ceremonialUse
chosen
Indicates that something is used in a ritual, religious, or formal ceremony rather than for ordinary or practical purposes.
-
E.
ceremonialAssociation
Indicates a relationship where entities are linked through participation in, role within, or connection to a formal ceremony or ritual event.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a25737567c81908f9c505300239181 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:47 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a25c2ead8481909996042efcae5e9d |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 3:08 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a25b4a0d448190a6fa6aeb30dc7e13 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 3:04 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 2:51 a.m.