Triple
T20218085
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Pokémon Black and White |
E495178
|
entity |
| Predicate | notableDesignChoice |
P46274
|
FINISHED |
| Object | focus on story-driven experience |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: focus on story-driven experience | Statement: [Pokémon Black and White, notableDesignChoice, focus on story-driven experience]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: notableDesignChoice Context triple: [Pokémon Black and White, notableDesignChoice, focus on story-driven experience]
-
A.
notableTechnicalFeature
Indicates that an entity possesses a significant or distinguishing technical characteristic or capability.
-
B.
notableStyleFeature
chosen
Indicates that an entity possesses a distinctive stylistic characteristic or design element that is especially noteworthy or defining.
-
C.
designedFeature
Indicates that one entity is a feature or component intentionally planned, created, or specified by another entity as part of a design.
-
D.
hasDesignConsideration
Indicates that one entity takes another entity into account as a factor, constraint, or requirement in its design or planning.
-
E.
hasDesignTradeoff
Indicates that one design choice involves compromises or conflicting benefits and drawbacks relative to other possible designs.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69da626cff80819097b530718a7c98b6 |
completed | April 11, 2026, 3:02 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e66edaeeb08190bb74bd4a10aceca2 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 6:22 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e55b18609481909ab28bc8750a642f |
completed | April 19, 2026, 10:45 p.m. |
Created at: April 11, 2026, 11:39 p.m.