Triple
T20203173
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Children of Heracles |
E493276
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasMember |
P10
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Cleodaeus |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Cleodaeus | Statement: [Children of Heracles, hasMember, Cleodaeus]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Cleodaeus Context triple: [Children of Heracles, hasMember, Cleodaeus]
-
A.
Cleodaeus
chosen
Cleodaeus is a figure in Greek mythology, a Heraclid prince known as a grandson of the hero Heracles and an ancestor of the Dorian kings of Sparta.
-
B.
Kleodaios
Kleodaios is an alternate form of the ancient Greek name Cleodaeus, a mythological figure associated with the lineage of Heracles.
-
C.
Callinicus
Callinicus is the honorific epithet meaning “gloriously victorious” borne by the Hellenistic ruler Seleucus II.
-
D.
Dionysodorus
Dionysodorus is a sophist who appears as a debating character in Plato’s dialogue "Euthydemus," known for his eristic and paradoxical argumentation.
-
E.
Cephisodotus the Elder
Cephisodotus the Elder was a 4th-century BCE Athenian sculptor, likely related to Praxiteles, renowned for his influential Classical Greek statues.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69da6269614c8190bb40475d9d477358 |
completed | April 11, 2026, 3:02 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e66d8ec73c8190b630599c5ceb22ac |
completed | April 20, 2026, 6:16 p.m. |
Created at: April 11, 2026, 11:38 p.m.