Triple
T20193028
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Niantic |
E493017
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasGameFeature |
P182
|
FINISHED |
| Object | real-world map integration |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: real-world map integration | Statement: [Niantic, hasGameFeature, real-world map integration]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasGameFeature Context triple: [Niantic, hasGameFeature, real-world map integration]
-
A.
hasFeature
chosen
Indicates that an entity possesses, exhibits, or includes a particular characteristic, attribute, or component.
-
B.
hasFeatureStatus
Indicates that an entity possesses a particular feature along with its current state or condition.
-
C.
hasFeatureCode
Indicates that an entity is associated with a specific feature identifier or code that characterizes one of its properties or attributes.
-
D.
hasGameSystem
Indicates that an item, product, or context is associated with or supports a particular game system or rules framework.
-
E.
supportsFeature
Indicates that one entity provides, enables, or is compatible with a particular feature or capability of another.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69da6268a034819081cbd9ea5a1c9475 |
completed | April 11, 2026, 3:02 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e66ad7270081908ed8513a8363e9b1 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 6:05 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e55b11124c8190babacf2a0fe2d057 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 10:45 p.m. |
Created at: April 11, 2026, 11:37 p.m.