Triple
T20180997
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Eddie Cantor |
E492727
|
entity |
| Predicate | alsoKnownAs |
P39
|
FINISHED |
| Object | “Banjo Eyes” |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: “Banjo Eyes” | Statement: [Eddie Cantor, alsoKnownAs, “Banjo Eyes”]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: “Banjo Eyes” Context triple: [Eddie Cantor, alsoKnownAs, “Banjo Eyes”]
-
A.
Banjo Eyes
chosen
Banjo Eyes is the nickname of Eddie Cantor, a popular early 20th-century American comedian, singer, and film and radio star known for his expressive, wide-eyed appearance.
-
B.
Frog Eyes
Frog Eyes is a Canadian indie rock band known for its eccentric, theatrical style and association with the early-2000s Victoria and Montreal indie scenes.
-
C.
"King’s Eyes"
"King’s Eyes" were royal inspectors in the Achaemenid Persian Empire who served as the king’s trusted agents, traveling the provinces to oversee and report on the conduct of satraps and other officials.
-
D.
“The Kinkajou”
“The Kinkajou” is a musical number featured in the 1927 Broadway musical comedy *Rio Rita*.
-
E.
"Glitter in Their Eyes"
"Glitter in Their Eyes" is a song by the American rock band Gung Ho.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69da6268a034819081cbd9ea5a1c9475 |
completed | April 11, 2026, 3:02 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e668eed2e88190b54b15e6545dbdf8 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 5:57 p.m. |
Created at: April 11, 2026, 11:36 p.m.