Triple
T20180425
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Bagelkhand Agency |
E492711
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasPrincelyState |
P74995
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Kothi State |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Kothi State | Statement: [Bagelkhand Agency, hasPrincelyState, Kothi State]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Kothi State Context triple: [Bagelkhand Agency, hasPrincelyState, Kothi State]
-
A.
Kothi State
chosen
Kothi State was a small princely state in central India that formed part of the Bagelkhand Agency during the British colonial period.
-
B.
Samthar State
Samthar State was a former princely state in colonial India, located in what is now Uttar Pradesh and ruled by a local dynasty under British suzerainty.
-
C.
Rajpipla State
Rajpipla State was a former princely state in British India, located in present-day Gujarat.
-
D.
Bijawar State
Bijawar State was a former princely state in British India, located in the Bundelkhand region of present-day Madhya Pradesh.
-
E.
Mundhar State
Mundhar State was a small princely hill state located in the Simla Hills region of colonial India.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69da6268a034819081cbd9ea5a1c9475 |
completed | April 11, 2026, 3:02 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e668edf27881909820f9103e72533e |
completed | April 20, 2026, 5:57 p.m. |
Created at: April 11, 2026, 11:36 p.m.