Triple

T20180322
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Sitamau State E492708 entity
Predicate sharesBorderWith P224 FINISHED
Object Ratlam State NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Ratlam State | Statement: [Sitamau State, sharesBorderWith, Ratlam State]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Ratlam State
Context triple: [Sitamau State, sharesBorderWith, Ratlam State]
  • A. Ratlam State chosen
    Ratlam State was a princely state in British India, located in the Malwa region of present-day Madhya Pradesh and ruled by a dynasty of Rathore Rajputs.
  • B. Alirajpur State
    Alirajpur State was a former princely state in colonial India, located in what is now Madhya Pradesh and ruled by local Rajput chiefs under British suzerainty.
  • C. Nandod State
    Nandod State was a former princely state in British India, later more widely known as Rajpipla State, located in present-day Gujarat.
  • D. Dhrol State
    Dhrol State was a former princely state in western India historically governed by the Jadeja Rajput dynasty.
  • E. Barwani State
    Barwani State was a former princely state in colonial India, located in the region of present-day Madhya Pradesh and ruled by local monarchs under British suzerainty.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69da6268a034819081cbd9ea5a1c9475 completed April 11, 2026, 3:02 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e668edf27881909820f9103e72533e completed April 20, 2026, 5:57 p.m.
Created at: April 11, 2026, 11:36 p.m.