Triple

T20168
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Coinage Act of 1792 E400 entity
Predicate definedEagleGoldContent P1837 FINISHED
Object 247.5 grains of pure gold LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 247.5 grains of pure gold | Statement: [Coinage Act of 1792, definedEagleGoldContent, 247.5 grains of pure gold]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: definedEagleGoldContent
Context triple: [Coinage Act of 1792, definedEagleGoldContent, 247.5 grains of pure gold]
  • A. describedIn
    Indicates that information about an entity is contained or documented within a specified source, such as a text, document, or media.
  • B. providedFor
    Indicates that one entity supplies, furnishes, or makes something available to or on behalf of another entity for its use or benefit.
  • C. appearsIn
    Indicates that an entity is present, featured, or occurs within a particular context, work, or medium.
  • D. historicallyPrizedFor
    Indicates that something has been especially valued or esteemed for a particular quality, use, or significance in the past.
  • E. envisionedAs
    Indicates that one entity is mentally pictured, imagined, or conceived in terms of another entity or role.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a240778d288190815c0052ebbbcc91 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:10 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a24703cb988190ad2bc181d27829e4 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:38 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a24650f1f0819081e638fafd18d687 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:35 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69a24702d4988190a54a4e578b7c919e completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:38 a.m.
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:14 a.m.