Triple
T2015321
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Downe, Kent, England |
E43780
|
entity |
| Predicate | scientificSignificance |
P15465
|
FINISHED |
| Object | site of Charles Darwin’s experiments and observations |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: site of Charles Darwin’s experiments and observations | Statement: [Downe, Kent, England, scientificSignificance, site of Charles Darwin’s experiments and observations]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: scientificSignificance Context triple: [Downe, Kent, England, scientificSignificance, site of Charles Darwin’s experiments and observations]
-
A.
isScientific
Indicates that something pertains to or is based on systematic scientific methods, principles, or knowledge.
-
B.
significance
Indicates that one entity holds particular importance, influence, or meaningful impact in relation to another entity or context.
-
C.
typeOfSignificance
chosen
Indicates that one entity specifies the nature or category of importance, relevance, or significance that another entity possesses.
-
D.
scientificStatus
Indicates the recognized level, role, or standing of an entity within the scientific community or system.
-
E.
scientificConsensus
Indicates that there is broad agreement among qualified experts or authoritative sources that a particular claim, finding, or theory is valid.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a88716e9f08190946313fdc949e3cf |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:25 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abb8cb16048190bc626685fbb5f707 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 5:34 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69abb7a03a1c81909ad50d56667db2d5 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 5:29 a.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:37 p.m.