Triple
T20135879
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Red line (Stockholm metro) |
E491023
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasTerminus |
P388
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Norsborg |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Norsborg | Statement: [Red line (Stockholm metro), hasTerminus, Norsborg]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Norsborg Context triple: [Red line (Stockholm metro), hasTerminus, Norsborg]
-
A.
Norsborg
chosen
Norsborg is a suburban district in Botkyrka Municipality, southwest of central Stockholm, Sweden, known as the terminus area of the Stockholm metro’s red line.
-
B.
Olsborg
Olsborg is a small village in Målselv Municipality in Troms og Finnmark county in northern Norway.
-
C.
Fagerborg
Fagerborg is a residential neighborhood in Oslo, Norway, known for its central location, historic buildings, and proximity to major educational institutions.
-
D.
Flesberg
Flesberg is a rural municipality in southeastern Norway known for its forests, traditional wooden architecture, and location in the Numedal valley.
-
E.
Rosersberg
Rosersberg is a locality in Stockholm County, Sweden, known for its historic Rosersberg Palace and its location near Stockholm Arlanda Airport.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69da62651a0c8190a3e05e95e056a66b |
completed | April 11, 2026, 3:01 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e66766e46c81908721fd47066dc9f8 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 5:50 p.m. |
Created at: April 11, 2026, 11:32 p.m.