Triple
T20113543
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Hole in the Wall experiment |
E490394
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | self-organized learning experiment |
C12985
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: self-organized learning experiment Context triple: [Hole in the Wall experiment, instanceOf, self-organized learning experiment]
-
A.
adaptive learning rate method
An adaptive learning rate method is an optimization technique that automatically adjusts the step size for each parameter during training based on past gradient information to improve convergence speed and stability.
-
B.
Monte Carlo reinforcement learning algorithm
A Monte Carlo reinforcement learning algorithm is a method that learns optimal policies by estimating value functions from complete, sampled episodes of experience without requiring a model of the environment’s dynamics.
-
C.
learning theory
chosen
Learning theory is the conceptual framework that explains how knowledge and skills are acquired, processed, retained, and applied through experience, instruction, and practice.
-
D.
active learning strategy
An active learning strategy is a structured approach to teaching and studying that engages learners directly in meaningful tasks—such as problem-solving, discussion, and reflection—to deepen understanding and improve long-term retention.
-
E.
learning rule
A learning rule is a formal method or algorithm that specifies how a system updates its internal parameters or representations based on experience or data to improve performance over time.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69da62636cc08190982cc71733a17b8d |
completed | April 11, 2026, 3:01 p.m. |
Created at: April 11, 2026, 11:29 p.m.