Triple

T2010498
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Clouds E43677 entity
Predicate featuresSongwritingStyle P9652 FINISHED
Object introspective LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: introspective | Statement: [Clouds, featuresSongwritingStyle, introspective]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: featuresSongwritingStyle
Context triple: [Clouds, featuresSongwritingStyle, introspective]
  • A. hasSongStyle
    Indicates that an entity possesses, is characterized by, or is associated with a particular style or genre of song.
  • B. featuresMusician
    Indicates that something (such as a work, event, or recording) prominently includes or showcases a particular musician.
  • C. styleOfMusic
    Indicates the musical genre or stylistic category that characterizes a piece of music, artist, or performance.
  • D. hasLyricalStyle chosen
    Indicates that one entity possesses or is characterized by a particular lyrical style in relation to another entity or context.
  • E. notableSongCharacteristic
    Indicates that a song is distinguished by a particular notable feature or quality, such as style, structure, or performance trait.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a88716e9f08190946313fdc949e3cf completed March 4, 2026, 7:25 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69abb8afe6f8819092679c86d1f2d041 completed March 7, 2026, 5:33 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69abb7a03a1c81909ad50d56667db2d5 completed March 7, 2026, 5:29 a.m.
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:37 p.m.