Triple
T20073474
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Table of Seven (Septemvirate) |
E499795
|
entity |
| Predicate | socialStatusOfJudges |
P138597
|
FINISHED |
| Object | high nobility |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: high nobility | Statement: [Table of Seven (Septemvirate), socialStatusOfJudges, high nobility]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: socialStatusOfJudges Context triple: [Table of Seven (Septemvirate), socialStatusOfJudges, high nobility]
-
A.
statusInJudges
Indicates that an entity holds a particular role, position, or standing within a group or body of judges.
-
B.
styleOfJudges
Indicates the characteristic manner or approach that judges use when performing their judging role.
-
C.
judgesAre
Indicates that one entity serves as a judge or evaluator of another entity.
-
D.
hasJudges
Indicates that one entity serves as a judge or panel of judges for another entity, such as an event, competition, or legal case.
-
E.
roleInJudges
Indicates that an entity holds or held a specific role, position, or function within a judicial body or among a group of judges.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69da627770948190997f486f9a2e370f |
completed | April 11, 2026, 3:02 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e66439efe881909a068c3f05022421 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 5:36 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e54cf369b88190931532420517dac7 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 9:45 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69e54fc20888819083c9118a09d0d2dc |
completed | April 19, 2026, 9:57 p.m. |
Created at: April 11, 2026, 3:40 p.m.