Triple
T20062930
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Capdenac |
E499528
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasPart |
P35
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Capdenac-Gare |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Capdenac-Gare | Statement: [Capdenac, hasPart, Capdenac-Gare]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Capdenac-Gare Context triple: [Capdenac, hasPart, Capdenac-Gare]
-
A.
Capdenac
chosen
Capdenac is a commune in southwestern France known for its picturesque setting along the Lot River and its historic hilltop village.
-
B.
Caudéran
Caudéran is a residential district in the western part of Bordeaux, France, known for its parks and suburban character.
-
C.
Gradignan
Gradignan is a suburban commune in southwestern France’s Gironde department, forming part of the Bordeaux metropolitan area and known for its green spaces and wine-growing surroundings.
-
D.
Mourenx
Mourenx is a commune in southwestern France’s Pyrénées-Atlantiques department, developed in the mid-20th century as a planned industrial town linked to nearby natural gas fields.
-
E.
Castagniers
Castagniers is a small commune in southeastern France, situated in the hills north of Nice in the Alpes-Maritimes department.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69da6276bcf48190aabbf279192a5fb4 |
completed | April 11, 2026, 3:02 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e66376f2d4819081b9e1b265650e5b |
completed | April 20, 2026, 5:33 p.m. |
Created at: April 11, 2026, 3:39 p.m.