Triple
T20023630
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Bivens doctrine |
E494921
|
entity |
| Predicate | namedAfter |
P63
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics | Statement: [Bivens doctrine, namedAfter, Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics Context triple: [Bivens doctrine, namedAfter, Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics]
-
A.
Bivens doctrine
chosen
The Bivens doctrine is a judicially created legal principle that allows individuals to seek damages in federal court against U.S. federal officials for certain constitutional rights violations, despite the general barrier of sovereign immunity.
-
B.
United States v. Wade
United States v. Wade is a landmark 1967 U.S. Supreme Court case that established a defendant’s Sixth Amendment right to counsel during post-indictment police lineups.
-
C.
United States v. O'Brien
United States v. O'Brien is a landmark 1968 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld a federal law banning the destruction of draft cards and established an important test for evaluating government regulation of symbolic speech under the First Amendment.
-
D.
Gelbard v. United States
Gelbard v. United States is a 1972 U.S. Supreme Court case that addressed whether grand jury witnesses could refuse to answer questions based on the government's alleged illegal use of wiretap evidence.
-
E.
Yasui v. United States
Yasui v. United States was a 1943 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the wartime conviction of Minoru Yasui for violating a military-imposed curfew on Japanese Americans, thereby affirming the government’s authority to restrict their civil liberties during World War II.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69da626bfd288190aa5d65098b6433ae |
completed | April 11, 2026, 3:02 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e6628a1ecc8190bf6ee0bedb61e0b8 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 5:29 p.m. |
Created at: April 11, 2026, 3:35 p.m.