Triple

T20023500
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Kimel v. Florida Board of Regents E494918 entity
Predicate relatedCase P3137 FINISHED
Object City of Boerne v. Flores NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: City of Boerne v. Flores | Statement: [Kimel v. Florida Board of Regents, relatedCase, City of Boerne v. Flores]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: City of Boerne v. Flores
Context triple: [Kimel v. Florida Board of Regents, relatedCase, City of Boerne v. Flores]
  • A. City of Boerne v. Flores chosen
    City of Boerne v. Flores is a 1997 U.S. Supreme Court case that curtailed Congress’s power under the Fourteenth Amendment and held that the Religious Freedom Restoration Act could not be applied to the states.
  • B. Van Orden v. Perry
    Van Orden v. Perry is a 2005 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the constitutionality of a Ten Commandments monument on Texas State Capitol grounds against an Establishment Clause challenge.
  • C. League of United Latin American Citizens v. Perry
    League of United Latin American Citizens v. Perry is a 2006 U.S. Supreme Court case that examined the constitutionality of Texas’s congressional redistricting plan, particularly its implications for Latino voting rights and partisan gerrymandering.
  • D. Eisenstadt v. Baird
    Eisenstadt v. Baird is a landmark 1972 U.S. Supreme Court decision that extended the right to possess and use contraceptives to unmarried individuals, significantly advancing privacy and equal protection jurisprudence.
  • E. Garcetti v. Ceballos
    Garcetti v. Ceballos is a 2006 U.S. Supreme Court decision holding that public employees do not have First Amendment protection for speech made pursuant to their official job duties.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69da626bfd288190aa5d65098b6433ae completed April 11, 2026, 3:02 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e6628a1ecc8190bf6ee0bedb61e0b8 completed April 20, 2026, 5:29 p.m.
Created at: April 11, 2026, 3:35 p.m.