Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: Cotton Petroleum Corp. v. New Mexico | Statement: [Indian Commerce Clause, citedInCase, Cotton Petroleum Corp. v. New Mexico]

Target entity: Cotton Petroleum Corp. v. New Mexico
Context triple: [Indian Commerce Clause, citedInCase, Cotton Petroleum Corp. v. New Mexico]

• A. Kleppe v. New Mexico
  Kleppe v. New Mexico is a 1976 U.S. Supreme Court case that affirmed broad federal authority over public lands and wildlife under the Constitution’s Property Clause.
• B. Bullcoming v. New Mexico
  Bullcoming v. New Mexico is a 2011 U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified the Confrontation Clause by holding that defendants have the right to cross-examine the specific analyst who prepared a forensic laboratory report used as evidence against them.
• C. Texas v. New Mexico
  Texas v. New Mexico is a U.S. Supreme Court interstate water rights case involving disputes over allocation and enforcement of river water compacts between the states.
• D. Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.
  Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co. is a 1982 U.S. Supreme Court case that limited the authority of non-Article III bankruptcy courts and reshaped the constitutional framework for federal bankruptcy adjudication.
• E. Colorado v. New Mexico, 459 U.S. 176 (1982)
  Colorado v. New Mexico, 459 U.S. 176 (1982), is a U.S. Supreme Court case addressing an interstate water rights dispute over the apportionment of the Vermejo River between Colorado and New Mexico.
• F. None of above. chosen
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. 
You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. 
# Instructions
Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. 
Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential.
# Response Format
Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"

Entity: Cotton Petroleum Corp. v. New Mexico
Triple: [Indian Commerce Clause, citedInCase, Cotton Petroleum Corp. v. New Mexico]

Cotton Petroleum Corp. v. New Mexico is a 1989 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld a state’s authority to impose severance taxes on non-Indian companies extracting oil and gas from tribal lands, clarifying limits on the Indian Commerce Clause and state taxation in Indian country.

Target entity: Cotton Petroleum Corp. v. New Mexico
Target entity description: Cotton Petroleum Corp. v. New Mexico is a 1989 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld a state’s authority to impose severance taxes on non-Indian companies extracting oil and gas from tribal lands, clarifying limits on the Indian Commerce Clause and state taxation in Indian country.

• A. Kleppe v. New Mexico
  Kleppe v. New Mexico is a 1976 U.S. Supreme Court case that affirmed broad federal authority over public lands and wildlife under the Constitution’s Property Clause.
• B. Bullcoming v. New Mexico
  Bullcoming v. New Mexico is a 2011 U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified the Confrontation Clause by holding that defendants have the right to cross-examine the specific analyst who prepared a forensic laboratory report used as evidence against them.
• C. Texas v. New Mexico
  Texas v. New Mexico is a U.S. Supreme Court interstate water rights case involving disputes over allocation and enforcement of river water compacts between the states.
• D. Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.
  Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co. is a 1982 U.S. Supreme Court case that limited the authority of non-Article III bankruptcy courts and reshaped the constitutional framework for federal bankruptcy adjudication.
• E. Colorado v. New Mexico, 459 U.S. 176 (1982)
  Colorado v. New Mexico, 459 U.S. 176 (1982), is a U.S. Supreme Court case addressing an interstate water rights dispute over the apportionment of the Vermejo River between Colorado and New Mexico.
• F. None of above. chosen