Triple

T20021516
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Massac County, Illinois E494870 entity
Predicate namedAfter P63 FINISHED
Object Fort Massac NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (3 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Fort Massac | Statement: [Massac County, Illinois, namedAfter, Fort Massac]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Fort Massac
Context triple: [Massac County, Illinois, namedAfter, Fort Massac]
  • A. Fort Macomb
    Fort Macomb is a 19th-century masonry coastal defense fortification near New Orleans, Louisiana, built to protect the approaches to the city and now preserved as a historic site.
  • B. Fort Ouiatenon
    Fort Ouiatenon was an 18th-century French fur-trading and military outpost near present-day Lafayette, Indiana, that became a strategic site in the struggle for control of the Old Northwest.
  • C. Fort Osage
    Fort Osage is a historic early 19th-century U.S. Army outpost and trading post on the Missouri River, significant for its role in frontier defense and commerce during westward expansion.
  • D. Fort Harmar
    Fort Harmar was a late 18th-century U.S. Army frontier outpost built at the confluence of the Ohio and Muskingum Rivers in present-day Ohio to secure American interests in the Northwest Territory and oversee relations with Native American tribes.
  • E. Fort Meigs
    Fort Meigs is a historic War of 1812-era U.S. military fortification located in present-day Perrysburg, Ohio, known for its role in defending the Northwest Territory against British and Native American forces.
  • F. None of above. chosen
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Fort Massac
Target entity description: Fort Massac is a historic 18th-century military fortification on the Ohio River in southern Illinois, notable for its role in early American frontier and Revolutionary War-era history.
  • A. Fort Macomb
    Fort Macomb is a 19th-century masonry coastal defense fortification near New Orleans, Louisiana, built to protect the approaches to the city and now preserved as a historic site.
  • B. Fort Ouiatenon
    Fort Ouiatenon was an 18th-century French fur-trading and military outpost near present-day Lafayette, Indiana, that became a strategic site in the struggle for control of the Old Northwest.
  • C. Fort Osage
    Fort Osage is a historic early 19th-century U.S. Army outpost and trading post on the Missouri River, significant for its role in frontier defense and commerce during westward expansion.
  • D. Fort Harmar
    Fort Harmar was a late 18th-century U.S. Army frontier outpost built at the confluence of the Ohio and Muskingum Rivers in present-day Ohio to secure American interests in the Northwest Territory and oversee relations with Native American tribes.
  • E. Fort Meigs
    Fort Meigs is a historic War of 1812-era U.S. military fortification located in present-day Perrysburg, Ohio, known for its role in defending the Northwest Territory against British and Native American forces.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69da626bfd288190aa5d65098b6433ae completed April 11, 2026, 3:02 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e6623fe1988190a1c09d392d866dc8 completed April 20, 2026, 5:28 p.m.
Created at: April 11, 2026, 3:35 p.m.