Triple

T20009307
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Cotswold vernacular architecture E494544 entity
Predicate typicalPlanForm P70722 FINISHED
Object linear plan LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: linear plan | Statement: [Cotswold vernacular architecture, typicalPlanForm, linear plan]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: typicalPlanForm
Context triple: [Cotswold vernacular architecture, typicalPlanForm, linear plan]
  • A. typicalForm
    Indicates that one entity represents the standard, characteristic, or most common form or shape in which another entity typically appears or is realized.
  • B. hasTypicalPlan chosen
    Indicates that there is a standard or commonly followed plan, procedure, or course of action typically associated with the given entity or situation.
  • C. planType
    Indicates the specific category or kind of plan associated with an entity, such as its level, structure, or intended use.
  • D. formationPlannedFor
    Indicates that a specific formation or organizational structure is scheduled or intended to be created for a given entity or context.
  • E. plannedVia
    Indicates that something is arranged, organized, or scheduled by means of a particular method, process, or intermediary.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69da626b2d748190886981ea90c8b2ea completed April 11, 2026, 3:02 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e661a81c5881909692fcaaf59a57c9 completed April 20, 2026, 5:26 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e54cdddbd48190becc8b2aa5ab4ef9 completed April 19, 2026, 9:45 p.m.
Created at: April 11, 2026, 3:33 p.m.