Triple
T2000692
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Cutter v. Wilkinson |
E43462
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | religious liberty case |
C8026
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: religious liberty case Context triple: [Cutter v. Wilkinson, instanceOf, religious liberty case]
-
A.
religious freedom law
Religious freedom law is a legal framework that protects individuals’ and groups’ rights to hold, practice, change, or abstain from religious beliefs without undue interference or discrimination by the state or others.
-
B.
religious freedom report
A religious freedom report is a document that systematically evaluates and describes the status, protections, violations, and trends related to individuals’ and groups’ rights to practice, change, or abstain from religion within a specific country or region.
-
C.
declaration on religious freedom
A declaration on religious freedom is an official statement or document that affirms and protects individuals’ rights to hold, practice, change, or abstain from religious beliefs without coercion or discrimination.
-
D.
liberal religion
Liberal religion is a form of religious belief and practice that emphasizes individual conscience, critical inquiry, and openness to reinterpretation of doctrines in light of contemporary knowledge and values.
-
E.
religious defendant
chosen
A religious defendant is an individual or entity facing legal action whose beliefs, practices, or institutional affiliation with a religion are central to the claims, defenses, or rights at issue in the case.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a88715dbbc8190b2299e29e955d997 |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:25 p.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:37 p.m.