Triple
T20003653
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | WKInterfaceMap |
E494395
|
entity |
| Predicate | usesCoordinateType |
P22467
|
FINISHED |
| Object | CLLocationCoordinate2D |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: CLLocationCoordinate2D | Statement: [WKInterfaceMap, usesCoordinateType, CLLocationCoordinate2D]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: usesCoordinateType Context triple: [WKInterfaceMap, usesCoordinateType, CLLocationCoordinate2D]
-
A.
usesCoordinateReference
Indicates that one entity adopts or relies on the coordinate reference system defined or provided by another entity.
-
B.
usesCoordinateRepresentation
Indicates that one entity expresses or handles another entity in terms of a specific coordinate-based representation.
-
C.
hasCoordinatesType
chosen
Indicates that an entity is associated with a specific type or system of coordinates used to define its position.
-
D.
hasCoordinates
Indicates that an entity is associated with specific spatial coordinates that define its position in a given reference system.
-
E.
hasCoordinateRole
Indicates that one entity shares an equivalent or parallel role or function with another entity within the same context or structure.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69da626b2d748190886981ea90c8b2ea |
completed | April 11, 2026, 3:02 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e661a3ad148190918f9dce755fe470 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 5:25 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e54cdddbd48190becc8b2aa5ab4ef9 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 9:45 p.m. |
Created at: April 11, 2026, 3:33 p.m.