Triple
T19987536
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | NES-101 |
E493971
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasExpansionPort |
P8614
|
FINISHED |
| Object | no bottom expansion port |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: no bottom expansion port | Statement: [NES-101, hasExpansionPort, no bottom expansion port]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasExpansionPort Context triple: [NES-101, hasExpansionPort, no bottom expansion port]
-
A.
expansionSlots
chosen
Indicates that an entity provides one or more hardware expansion slots available for adding additional components or capabilities.
-
B.
hasExpansion
Indicates that one entity serves as a larger, extended, or elaborated form of another entity.
-
C.
expansionBus
Indicates a hardware connection through which a device can be attached to or communicate over an expansion bus.
-
D.
hasExpansionInterface
Indicates that an entity provides or supports an interface through which it can be expanded or extended with additional components or functionality.
-
E.
hasExpansionType
Indicates that an entity is associated with a particular mode or category of expansion (such as how it grows, extends, or scales).
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69da626a67648190af9653832a3aeced |
completed | April 11, 2026, 3:02 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e65fdd1a5c8190af756632aac38bf4 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 5:18 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e537fd311881908448f2aea8b4812e |
completed | April 19, 2026, 8:15 p.m. |
Created at: April 11, 2026, 3:29 p.m.