Triple
T19985570
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Muggle Studies |
E493921
|
entity |
| Predicate | previousIdeology |
P81399
|
FINISHED |
| Object | pro-Muggle understanding |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: pro-Muggle understanding | Statement: [Muggle Studies, previousIdeology, pro-Muggle understanding]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: previousIdeology Context triple: [Muggle Studies, previousIdeology, pro-Muggle understanding]
-
A.
parentIdeologicalCurrent
Indicates that one ideological current is the direct predecessor or source from which another ideological current develops or derives.
-
B.
hasPredecessorIdeology
chosen
Indicates that one ideology directly precedes and influences the development or adoption of another ideology.
-
C.
ideologyHistorical
Indicates a relationship where an ideology is associated with, originates from, or is characteristic of a particular historical period or context.
-
D.
ideology
Indicates the belief system or set of political, social, or philosophical principles that an entity adheres to or promotes.
-
E.
opposingIdeology
Indicates that two entities hold conflicting or mutually incompatible belief systems, doctrines, or ideological positions.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69da626a67648190af9653832a3aeced |
completed | April 11, 2026, 3:02 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e65d162b008190a18d325796d75d77 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 5:06 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e537fd311881908448f2aea8b4812e |
completed | April 19, 2026, 8:15 p.m. |
Created at: April 11, 2026, 3:29 p.m.