Triple
T1998460
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Aligoté |
E43409
|
entity |
| Predicate | wineAgeingPreference |
P35382
|
FINISHED |
| Object | consumed young |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: consumed young | Statement: [Aligoté, wineAgeingPreference, consumed young]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: wineAgeingPreference Context triple: [Aligoté, wineAgeingPreference, consumed young]
-
A.
wineAgeingPotential
Indicates the capacity or suitability of a wine to improve in quality or maintain desirable characteristics over time with proper aging.
-
B.
wineStructure
Indicates the overall sensory framework of a wine, encompassing how its components like acidity, tannin, body, and alcohol are balanced and interact.
-
C.
wineStyle
Indicates the stylistic category or type of wine (such as its production style, sweetness, body, or other defining characteristics) associated with an entity.
-
D.
wineCharacteristic
Indicates a descriptive property or quality attributed to a wine, such as its flavor, aroma, color, or style.
-
E.
oenologicalSignificance
Indicates the relationship in which something holds importance, relevance, or notable impact within the context of wine or winemaking.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a88715dbbc8190b2299e29e955d997 |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:25 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abb91055d88190a980e7b42e5895d4 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 5:35 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69abb79c97d48190b3147430ed39faa9 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 5:29 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69abb90ec7948190bbfb0329e9e67cca |
completed | March 7, 2026, 5:35 a.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:37 p.m.