Triple

T19975626
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Malwa Agency E493682 entity
Predicate appliesToJurisdiction P82 FINISHED
Object Central India princely states NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (3 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Central India princely states | Statement: [Malwa Agency, appliesToJurisdiction, Central India princely states]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Central India princely states
Context triple: [Malwa Agency, appliesToJurisdiction, Central India princely states]
  • A. Gujarat princely states
    The Gujarat princely states were a group of semi-autonomous, monarch-ruled territories in western India that existed under British suzerainty until their integration into the Indian Union after independence.
  • B. Shan States
    The Shan States were a collection of semi-autonomous, traditionally ruled principalities in what is now eastern Myanmar, historically inhabited by the Shan people and later organized as a distinct administrative region under British colonial rule.
  • C. Chota Nagpur princely states
    The Chota Nagpur princely states were a group of semi-autonomous feudal kingdoms and chiefdoms in the Chota Nagpur Plateau region of eastern India that existed under British suzerainty until Indian independence.
  • D. Central Provinces
    The Central Provinces was a major administrative region of British India located in central India, encompassing parts of present-day Madhya Pradesh and Maharashtra.
  • E. Jhansi State
    Jhansi State was a princely state in northern India, historically significant for its role in the 1857 uprising under the leadership of Rani Lakshmibai.
  • F. None of above. chosen
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Central India princely states
Target entity description: The Central India princely states were a group of semi-autonomous, British-protected monarchies in central India that existed under indirect colonial rule until their integration into independent India.
  • A. Gujarat princely states
    The Gujarat princely states were a group of semi-autonomous, monarch-ruled territories in western India that existed under British suzerainty until their integration into the Indian Union after independence.
  • B. Shan States
    The Shan States were a collection of semi-autonomous, traditionally ruled principalities in what is now eastern Myanmar, historically inhabited by the Shan people and later organized as a distinct administrative region under British colonial rule.
  • C. Chota Nagpur princely states
    The Chota Nagpur princely states were a group of semi-autonomous feudal kingdoms and chiefdoms in the Chota Nagpur Plateau region of eastern India that existed under British suzerainty until Indian independence.
  • D. Central Provinces
    The Central Provinces was a major administrative region of British India located in central India, encompassing parts of present-day Madhya Pradesh and Maharashtra.
  • E. Jhansi State
    Jhansi State was a princely state in northern India, historically significant for its role in the 1857 uprising under the leadership of Rani Lakshmibai.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69da626a67648190af9653832a3aeced completed April 11, 2026, 3:02 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e65d0f4fb48190ad63afeff3513523 completed April 20, 2026, 5:06 p.m.
Created at: April 11, 2026, 3:25 p.m.