Triple
T19952586
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | The Rascals |
E479596
|
entity |
| Predicate | notableWork |
P4
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Groovin' |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Groovin' | Statement: [The Rascals, notableWork, Groovin']
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Groovin' Context triple: [The Rascals, notableWork, Groovin']
-
A.
Groovin’
chosen
"Groovin’" is a soulful R&B track best known from the late 1960s, emblematic of the smooth, laid-back style that influenced much of soul music of its era.
-
B.
Groovin' Blue
Groovin' Blue is a jazz album by saxophonist Curtis Amy, recognized for its soulful hard bop style and strong ensemble performances.
-
C.
Down in the Groove
Down in the Groove is a 1988 Bob Dylan studio album known for its patchwork of sessions, extensive guest musicians, and generally poor critical reception.
-
D.
Groove Me
"Groove Me" is a 1970 funk and R&B hit single by King Floyd, known for its infectious groove and success on the soul and pop charts.
-
E.
Groove Me
"Groove Me" is an R&B/hip-hop song by Salt-N-Pepa from their 1994 album *Very Necessary*, showcasing the group's signature blend of confident lyrics and danceable beats.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8e522a17c819095165d4d24939fd8 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 11:55 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e65a6c87388190a1bada3117acaf7b |
completed | April 20, 2026, 4:55 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:54 p.m.