Triple
T19943440
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Reorganization Plan No. 1 of 1978 |
E479363
|
entity |
| Predicate | federalLawContext |
P137942
|
FINISHED |
| Object | post-Watergate administrative reforms |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: post-Watergate administrative reforms | Statement: [Reorganization Plan No. 1 of 1978, federalLawContext, post-Watergate administrative reforms]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: federalLawContext Context triple: [Reorganization Plan No. 1 of 1978, federalLawContext, post-Watergate administrative reforms]
-
A.
federalLawRepresentedBy
Indicates that a federal law is formally presented, advocated, or sponsored by a particular representative or legal entity.
-
B.
federalLawAppliesFrom
Indicates that a specified federal law becomes effective or governs starting from a particular point in time or jurisdictional context.
-
C.
federalRuleInvolved
Indicates that the situation, case, or action involves or is governed by a specific federal rule or regulation.
-
D.
federalStatus
Indicates that an entity holds a particular legal or administrative status under federal (national) authority or jurisdiction.
-
E.
legalExceptionUnitedStates
Indicates that the usual legal rule or requirement does not apply in the United States due to a specific statutory, regulatory, or judicially recognized exception.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8e522a17c819095165d4d24939fd8 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 11:55 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e65a64b2788190a49c4ed40aa93b98 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 4:55 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e537f47c508190853c4e009c6b5566 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 8:15 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69e543c42c688190a22f4d31ec692377 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 9:06 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:54 p.m.