Triple

T19937639
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject James L. Massey E479214 entity
Predicate knownFor P22 FINISHED
Object Massey–Omura multiplier NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (3 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Massey–Omura multiplier | Statement: [James L. Massey, knownFor, Massey–Omura multiplier]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Massey–Omura multiplier
Context triple: [James L. Massey, knownFor, Massey–Omura multiplier]
  • A. Rabin cryptosystem
    The Rabin cryptosystem is a public-key encryption scheme based on the hardness of integer factorization, notable for its provable security equivalence to factoring and its similarity to RSA.
  • B. Blum–Blum–Shub pseudorandom number generator
    The Blum–Blum–Shub pseudorandom number generator is a cryptographically secure generator based on the hardness of factoring large composite numbers, widely studied in theoretical computer science and cryptography.
  • C. Cramer–Shoup cryptosystem
    The Cramer–Shoup cryptosystem is a public-key encryption scheme designed to be secure against adaptive chosen-ciphertext attacks, improving on earlier systems like ElGamal in terms of robustness and security guarantees.
  • D. Diffie–Hellman key exchange
    Diffie–Hellman key exchange is a foundational cryptographic protocol that enables two parties to securely establish a shared secret over an insecure communication channel.
  • E. Damgård–Jurik cryptosystem
    The Damgård–Jurik cryptosystem is a public-key encryption scheme that generalizes the Paillier cryptosystem to support larger message spaces and flexible homomorphic properties.
  • F. None of above. chosen
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Massey–Omura multiplier
Target entity description: The Massey–Omura multiplier is a hardware-efficient digital circuit architecture designed for fast finite-field multiplication, widely used in error-correcting codes and cryptographic systems.
  • A. Rabin cryptosystem
    The Rabin cryptosystem is a public-key encryption scheme based on the hardness of integer factorization, notable for its provable security equivalence to factoring and its similarity to RSA.
  • B. Blum–Blum–Shub pseudorandom number generator
    The Blum–Blum–Shub pseudorandom number generator is a cryptographically secure generator based on the hardness of factoring large composite numbers, widely studied in theoretical computer science and cryptography.
  • C. Cramer–Shoup cryptosystem
    The Cramer–Shoup cryptosystem is a public-key encryption scheme designed to be secure against adaptive chosen-ciphertext attacks, improving on earlier systems like ElGamal in terms of robustness and security guarantees.
  • D. Diffie–Hellman key exchange
    Diffie–Hellman key exchange is a foundational cryptographic protocol that enables two parties to securely establish a shared secret over an insecure communication channel.
  • E. Damgård–Jurik cryptosystem
    The Damgård–Jurik cryptosystem is a public-key encryption scheme that generalizes the Paillier cryptosystem to support larger message spaces and flexible homomorphic properties.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8e522a17c819095165d4d24939fd8 completed April 10, 2026, 11:55 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e65a17fb2c8190b3aaae88e741648a completed April 20, 2026, 4:53 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:53 p.m.