Triple
T19937482
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Lidingöbanan |
E479209
|
entity |
| Predicate | terminus |
P388
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Gåshaga brygga |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Gåshaga brygga | Statement: [Lidingöbanan, terminus, Gåshaga brygga]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Gåshaga brygga Context triple: [Lidingöbanan, terminus, Gåshaga brygga]
-
A.
Gåshaga brygga
chosen
Gåshaga brygga is a light rail terminus and ferry pier located on the eastern tip of Lidingö island in the Stockholm archipelago.
-
B.
Krokstadøra
Krokstadøra is a small village in Trøndelag county, Norway, situated along the Orkla River and serving as a local community center within the municipality.
-
C.
Kalvebod Brygge
Kalvebod Brygge is a waterfront area in central Copenhagen known for its modern architecture, office buildings, and harborside promenades along the inner harbor.
-
D.
Bryggja
Bryggja is a small coastal village in the former Vågsøy municipality in Vestland county, western Norway.
-
E.
Byviksfortet
Byviksfortet is a coastal fortification on the island of Rindö in the Stockholm archipelago, historically part of Sweden’s naval defenses.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8e522a17c819095165d4d24939fd8 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 11:55 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e65a17fb2c8190b3aaae88e741648a |
completed | April 20, 2026, 4:53 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:53 p.m.