Triple
T19912249
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | 31st Circuit Court of Michigan |
E478575
|
entity |
| Predicate | partOf |
P40
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Michigan One Court of Justice |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Michigan One Court of Justice | Statement: [31st Circuit Court of Michigan, partOf, Michigan One Court of Justice]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Michigan One Court of Justice Context triple: [31st Circuit Court of Michigan, partOf, Michigan One Court of Justice]
-
A.
Michigan Court of Claims
The Michigan Court of Claims is a specialized state trial court that handles civil lawsuits seeking monetary damages against the State of Michigan and its agencies.
-
B.
Michigan Court System
chosen
The Michigan Court System is the statewide judicial branch responsible for interpreting and applying Michigan law through a hierarchy of trial and appellate courts.
-
C.
Michigan v. Doran
Michigan v. Doran is a 1978 U.S. Supreme Court decision that clarified the limited role of asylum states in reviewing extradition requests from other states under the Extradition Clause and federal statute.
-
D.
Michigan v. Tucker
Michigan v. Tucker is a 1974 U.S. Supreme Court decision that limited the exclusionary rule’s application to statements obtained without full Miranda warnings, holding that derivative evidence from such statements could still be admissible.
-
E.
Michigan v. Bryant
Michigan v. Bryant is a 2011 U.S. Supreme Court decision that further defined the scope of the Confrontation Clause by clarifying when statements made to police are considered “testimonial” and thus subject to Sixth Amendment protections.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8e520682081909892916424699bd5 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 11:55 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e659908ba88190ae0ee0fbfe4ddf64 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 4:51 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:53 p.m.