Triple
T198767
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Norwegian flag |
E4054
|
entity |
| Predicate | colorRepresents |
P7182
|
FINISHED |
| Object | red – historical ties to Denmark |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: red – historical ties to Denmark | Statement: [Norwegian flag, colorRepresents, red – historical ties to Denmark]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: colorRepresents Context triple: [Norwegian flag, colorRepresents, red – historical ties to Denmark]
-
A.
colors
Indicates that one entity assigns, describes, or provides the color or colors of another entity.
-
B.
colorOftenUsed
chosen
Indicates that a particular color is frequently used or commonly applied in relation to something.
-
C.
colorCharge
Indicates a relationship where an entity possesses a specific quantum color charge (such as red, green, or blue) in the context of strong nuclear interactions.
-
D.
partyColor
Indicates the political party affiliation or ideological group with which an entity is associated, typically represented by a specific color.
-
E.
canRepresent
Indicates that one entity is capable of serving as a valid stand-in, proxy, or expression for another entity in a given context.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a254bca59881909a15e1496f1508c7 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:36 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a25be47ea881909c296b30a0d47a65 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 3:07 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a25b47481c8190add47c641c977bb9 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 3:04 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 2:44 a.m.