Triple
T19870739
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Kinuso, Alberta |
E477509
|
entity |
| Predicate | locatedIn |
P40
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Big Lakes County |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Big Lakes County | Statement: [Kinuso, Alberta, locatedIn, Big Lakes County]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Big Lakes County Context triple: [Kinuso, Alberta, locatedIn, Big Lakes County]
-
A.
Big Lakes County
chosen
Big Lakes County is a rural municipal district in north-central Alberta, Canada, known for its lakes, forests, and small communities.
-
B.
Lake of the Woods County
Lake of the Woods County is a sparsely populated county in northern Minnesota known for encompassing the Northwest Angle and extensive lake and wilderness areas.
-
C.
Dunn County
Dunn County is a largely rural county in western North Dakota known for its proximity to major reservoirs, energy development, and expansive prairie landscapes.
-
D.
Chippewa County
Chippewa County is a county in western Minnesota known for its agricultural landscape, small rural communities, and location along several rivers and waterways.
-
E.
Chippewa County
Chippewa County is a county-level local government jurisdiction in the U.S. state of Michigan that administers regional services and infrastructure for its residents.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8e51e7d948190aedbcd6c30361c39 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 11:55 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e658a3d2b08190ad81914d4860df0e |
completed | April 20, 2026, 4:47 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:51 p.m.