Triple

T19804467
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Cinergy Corporation E475773 entity
Predicate hadCustomerType P809 FINISHED
Object residential customers LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: residential customers | Statement: [Cinergy Corporation, hadCustomerType, residential customers]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hadCustomerType
Context triple: [Cinergy Corporation, hadCustomerType, residential customers]
  • A. customerType chosen
    Indicates the classification or category assigned to a customer based on their characteristics, status, or relationship with a business.
  • B. hasSecondaryCustomerType
    Indicates that an entity is associated with an additional, non-primary customer classification or role.
  • C. hadMembershipType
    Indicates that an entity possessed or was assigned a specific type or category of membership.
  • D. hasCustomers
    Indicates that an entity maintains a business relationship in which other entities purchase or receive its goods or services as customers.
  • E. hasVisitorType
    Indicates the type or category of visitor associated with an entity (e.g., guest, customer, tourist, patient).
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8e51bc4208190a1c57d8c5d1b15e4 completed April 10, 2026, 11:55 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e65427546c819082c8eb0d63e3f5fe completed April 20, 2026, 4:28 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e5305858108190bbbfdb9ba3ab9f80 completed April 19, 2026, 7:43 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:49 p.m.