Triple
T1979751
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | STP-2 |
E42996
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasTechnologyDemonstration |
P35733
|
FINISHED |
| Object | space weather instruments |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: space weather instruments | Statement: [STP-2, hasTechnologyDemonstration, space weather instruments]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasTechnologyDemonstration Context triple: [STP-2, hasTechnologyDemonstration, space weather instruments]
-
A.
demonstratedAt
Indicates that an action, behavior, or capability was shown or exhibited at a particular event, location, or point in time.
-
B.
demonstratedConcept
Indicates that an entity has shown, illustrated, or made evident a particular concept through example, explanation, or action.
-
C.
introducedAsDemonstrator
Indicates that one entity is presented or identified to another entity specifically in the role of a demonstrator.
-
D.
designedToDemonstrate
Indicates that something was intentionally created or arranged for the purpose of showing, illustrating, or proving a particular concept, feature, or behavior.
-
E.
demonstratedBy
Indicates that something is shown, proven, or made evident through the actions, behavior, or example of a particular entity.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a88713ddc88190a969715658ebe7a8 |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:25 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abb96f932881908bebfc4176fda7c0 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 5:36 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69abb798d288819083132cf14605bd02 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 5:28 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69abb96e07c08190beed60096e9d71b4 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 5:36 a.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:36 p.m.