Triple
T19795114
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Aurelia Davis |
E475519
|
entity |
| Predicate | caseCitation |
P771
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Davis v. Monroe County Board of Education, 526 U.S. 629 (1999) |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Davis v. Monroe County Board of Education, 526 U.S. 629 (1999) | Statement: [Aurelia Davis, caseCitation, Davis v. Monroe County Board of Education, 526 U.S. 629 (1999)]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Davis v. Monroe County Board of Education, 526 U.S. 629 (1999) Context triple: [Aurelia Davis, caseCitation, Davis v. Monroe County Board of Education, 526 U.S. 629 (1999)]
-
A.
Davis v. Monroe County Board of Education
chosen
Davis v. Monroe County Board of Education is a 1999 U.S. Supreme Court decision holding that schools receiving federal funds can be liable under Title IX for student-on-student sexual harassment when they are deliberately indifferent to known acts of harassment that are severe, pervasive, and objectively offensive.
-
B.
Meredith v. Jefferson County Board of Education
Meredith v. Jefferson County Board of Education was a U.S. Supreme Court case challenging the use of race in public school student assignment plans as part of broader litigation over voluntary school desegregation.
-
C.
Board of Education v. Pico
Board of Education v. Pico is a 1982 U.S. Supreme Court case in which a divided Court held that public school boards may not remove books from school libraries simply because they dislike the ideas contained in them, recognizing students’ limited First Amendment right to receive information.
-
D.
Davis v. Washington
Davis v. Washington is a U.S. Supreme Court decision that further defined the scope of the Confrontation Clause by clarifying when statements made to law enforcement are considered “testimonial” and thus subject to the rule announced in Crawford v. Washington.
-
E.
Board of Education of Monroe-Woodbury Central School District
The Board of Education of Monroe-Woodbury Central School District is the elected policymaking body responsible for overseeing the district’s public schools, budget, and educational priorities.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8e51b014081908b263e167370529a |
completed | April 10, 2026, 11:55 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e653c659088190928fa4c9264135d3 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 4:26 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:49 p.m.