Triple

T19790902
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject cult of Min E475406 entity
Predicate devotedTo P8131 FINISHED
Object Min NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Min | Statement: [cult of Min, devotedTo, Min]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Min
Context triple: [cult of Min, devotedTo, Min]
  • A. Min chosen
    Min is an ancient Egyptian fertility and male potency god, often depicted as a mummified man with an erect phallus and associated with procreation, harvests, and the eastern desert.
  • B. Min
    Min is a major branch of the Chinese language family, encompassing diverse regional varieties spoken primarily in Fujian, Taiwan, and among overseas Chinese communities.
  • C. Min
    Min is a common given name of Chinese origin used for both males and females.
  • D. Min
    Min is a Chinese surname that is relatively uncommon and can be represented by several different Chinese characters.
  • E. Min
    Min is a common place name element used in various geographic locations, often derived from local linguistic or historical origins.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8e51b014081908b263e167370529a completed April 10, 2026, 11:55 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e653c217bc819092c517b27ca22087 completed April 20, 2026, 4:26 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:49 p.m.